Property
tax exemptions may be next battle in subsidy warBy
Mike Sunnucks Phoenix Business Journal 10.23.09
The
next shoe to drop in the legal fight over special tax breaks
and subsidies for developers could be over the 100 percent tax
exemptions ponied up for high-profile projects such as ASU
SkySong in Scottsdale and enjoyed by professional sports
teams.
That
action could come after the Arizona Supreme Court decides
whether a $97 million tax break for the CityNorth mixed-use development in
northeast
Phoenix
is constitutional under state law. A judgment in that case
isn’t expected before the end of the year, but those opposed
to developer subsidies already are strategizing for future
battles.
The
first is a lawsuit expected to be filed over government
property lease excise taxes, or GPLETs. These funding
mechanisms allow government entities that own land to lease it
back to private developers and businesses, which then pay
lower-than-normal property taxes. The Goldwater
Institute and Arizona Sen. Ken Cheuvront,
D-Phoenix, said they plan to file suit to do away with GPLETs.
Cheuvront
wants to sue to try to stop the tax breaks. Clint Bolick,
attorney for the Goldwater Institute, said the conservative
think tank also is looking at other tax arrangements to
determine whether they are legal.
“We’re
just beginning to burrow deeply into GPLETs,” Bolick said.
“To the extent that lease rates are below market after tax
benefits are taken into consideration, it may represent an
illegal subsidy, and also may violate equal protection of the
law if similarly situated tenants are paying more in private
buildings.”
As
that case works its way through the courts, the same skeptics
want to go after entities including SkySong, the Arizona
Cardinals, the Phoenix
Suns and the Arizona
Diamondbacks, which pay no property taxes
because they lease their facilities from city or county
governments.
None
of those arrangements are considered GPLETs, though that
mechanism has been used extensively for downtown
Phoenix
developments including the Colliers Center, Arizona Center and
Renaissance office towers. The new Cancer
Treatment Centers of America hospital in
Goodyear also is a GPLET.
Real
estate developers and business interests say striking down the
CityNorth subsidy, GPLETs or other tax incentives would
discourage investments and economic development.
‘Attacks
will continue’
Grady
Gammage Jr., a partner with Gammage & Burnham PLC, is
representing developer Thomas J. Klutznick & Co. in the
CityNorth case. He expects the GPLET and property tax battles
to be waged on the political front, with restrictions proposed
by the Arizona Legislature. He said critics of tax breaks and
special incentives will continue to look for ways to bring the
issue to the forefront.
“I
think the attacks will continue,” he said.
Arizona
doesn’t have traditional tax help to spur investments, such
as tax-increment financing, so city governments created a
variety of incentives and assistance programs, which often are
criticized.
Gammage
said some projects, such as development around
Tempe
Town
Lake
, might not have gotten built without GPLETs or other
incentives. He also said getting rid of incentives would hurt
Arizona
when competing for projects that could go to other states that
offer special financing.
Tim
Lawless, Arizona Chapter president of NAIOP, a national
commercial real estate organization, said property tax
incentives need to be on the table for redevelopment projects,
especially those in blighted areas and those attracting
high-wage jobs. But he addded that such tax breaks should be
used judiciously so as not to require higher property taxes on
others.
Bolick
and Cheuvront argue that special tax arrangements are unfair
because they benefit favored businesses or developers.
Never assessed
SkySong
sits on land owned by the city of
Scottsdale
at the former Los Arcos Mall site at McDowell and
Scottsdale
roads.
Scottsdale
leases the land to the nonprofit ASU Foundation, but the
foundation does not pay property taxes on the 37-acre parcel,
according to city spokesman Pat Dodds. He and SkySong
representative Tom Evans said ASU’s high-tech park is not a
GPLET.
Maricopa
County Assessor’s Office data shows the previous owners of
the site, including real estate developer Steve Ellman, paid
between $52,000 and $189,000 a year in property taxes on the
Los Arcos site from 1993 to 2004.
Ellman
sold the site to the ASU Foundation in 2005 for $41.5 million.
The foundation then sold the land to the city of
Scottsdale
and leased it back for SkySong. The foundation is the
nonprofit fundraising arm of ASU.
SkySong
is being developed by the Plaza
Cos. and Higgins Development Partners. Its tenants
include Ticketmaster, Canon and law firm Squire
Sanders & Dempsey LLP.
Ellman
had wanted to build an arena for the Phoenix Coyotes on the
site and then later add a big-box retail center, both of which
likely would have been subject to property taxes. Those plans
were rejected.
For more
information about Lillian Wong & Associates and our services, please visit
my website at LillianWong.net or email me at
Lillian@LillianWong.com.
If
you would like to unsubscribe to this mailing list, please
click on this 'REMOVE'
link and follow the instructions shown on the automated
'Opt-Out Service'.